Current:Home > NewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -AssetFocus
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-16 22:27:32
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (5683)
Related
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Man says he survived month lost in Amazon rainforest by eating insects, drinking urine and fighting off animal attacks
- 18 Amazon Problem-Solving Products That Keep Selling Out
- Iran to allow more inspections at nuclear sites, U.N. says
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Go Behind the Scenes of the Star-Studded 2023 SAG Awards With Photos of Zendaya, Jenna Ortega and More
- Kenneth Anger, gay film pioneer and unreliable Hollywood chronicler, dies at 96
- On International Women's Day, Afghan women blast the Taliban and say the world has neglected us completely
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- In 'The Fight for Midnight,' a teen boy confronts the abortion debate
Ranking
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get a $189 Wallet for Just $45
- These are the winners of this year's James Beard Awards, the biggest night in food
- 20 sharks found dead after killer whales' surgical feeding frenzy
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- The MixtapE! Presents The Weeknd, Halsey, Logic and More New Music Musts
- Many teens don't know how to swim. A grassroots organization is trying to change that
- Ed Sheeran reveals his wife was diagnosed with a tumor while pregnant
Recommendation
Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
TikToker Taylor Frankie Paul Arrested on Domestic Violence Charges
Pregnant Nikki Reed Shares Her Tips for a Clean Lifestyle
Remains of baby found in U.K. following couple's arrest
From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
Want Johnny Carson's desk? A trove of TV memorabilia is up for auction
Brendan Fraser Rides the Wave to Success With Big 2023 SAG Awards Win
Prince Harry and Meghan asked to vacate royal Frogmore Cottage home as it's reportedly offered to Prince Andrew