Current:Home > MarketsLGBTQ+ rights group sues over Iowa law banning school library books, gender identity discussion -AssetFocus
LGBTQ+ rights group sues over Iowa law banning school library books, gender identity discussion
View
Date:2025-04-14 15:22:18
Several families are suing to stop Iowa’s new law that bans books from school libraries, forbids teachers from raising LGBTQ+ issues and forces educators in some cases to out the gender identity of students to their parents.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa and Lambda announced the federal lawsuit Tuesday, saying the law passed earlier this year by the Republican-led Legislature and enacted this fall “seeks to silence LGBTQ+ students, erase any recognition of LGBTQ+ people from public schools, and bans books with sexual or LGBTQ+ content.”
Under the law, educators are forbidden from raising gender identity and sexual orientation issues with students through grade six, and school administrators are required to notify parents if students ask to change their pronouns or names. The law’s section that bans books depicting sex acts from school libraries includes an exception for religious texts, like the Christian Bible.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Iowa Safe Schools, an organization that advocates for LGBTQ+ children, and seven Iowa students, ranging in age from fourth to 12th grades, and their families. It seeks an injunction blocking the law while the lawsuit plays out in court and ultimately seeks to have the law declared unconstitutional as a violation of students’ and teachers’ free speech and equal protection rights.
“The First Amendment does not allow our state or our schools to remove books or issue blanket bans on discussion and materials simply because a group of politicians or parents find them offensive,” ACLU attorney Thomas Story said.
Gov. Kim Reynolds, who signed the measure into law, defended it as “protecting children from pornography and sexually explicit content.”
“Books with graphic depictions of sex acts have absolutely no place in our schools,” Reynolds said in a written statement.
One plaintiff, Iowa City high school senior Puck Carlson, said in an online news conference that the law is having a devastating effect on Iowa LGBTQ+ students. She has watched her younger LGBTQ+ sister struggle to feel safe in school since the law took effect, she said.
“School is one of the main places that children read, and being able to access literature in which you can see yourself is instrumental to a student’s discovery of themselves,” Carlson said. “It certainly was to me. So removing these books not only makes people less visible, but it also stops students from discovering and being true to themselves.”
Penalties for violating the law will go into effect Jan. 1 and place administrators, teachers, librarians and other school staff at risk of disciplinary action, including termination and loss of their state professional education license.
Schools across Iowa have pulled hundreds of titles from their shelves in response to the law, the ACLU said. Many of the banned books contain content of particular relevance to LGBTQ+ students, including LGBTQ+ characters, historical figures or themes.
“As a result of the ban, LGBTQ+ students are denied the comfort of narratives that include LGBTQ+ characters and the solace that they are not alone,” the ACLU said.
Republicans have largely backed such laws in Iowa and other states in recent years that prohibit teachers from raising gender identity and sexual orientation issues, restrict the restrooms transgender students can use, and ban treatments like puberty blockers and hormone therapy for trans minors. Many are facing challenges in court.
Republican lawmakers say the laws are designed to affirm parents’ rights and protect children. The issues have become flashpoints in the race for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.
veryGood! (7131)
Related
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Tribes Working to Buck Unemployment with Green Jobs
- Power Giant AEP Talks Up Clean Energy, but Coal Is Still King in Its Portfolio
- The Real Reason Kellyanne Conway's 18-Year-Old Daughter Claudia Joined Playboy
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Trump’s Forest Service Planned More Logging in the Yaak Valley, Environmentalists Want Biden To Make it a ‘Climate Refuge’
- Police Treating Dakota Access Protesters ‘Like an Enemy on the Battlefield,’ Groups Say
- This Affordable Amazon Cooling Towel Will Help You Beat the Summer Heat
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Congress Extends Tax Breaks for Clean Energy — and Carbon Capture
Ranking
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- The Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Climate Change. Is it Ready to Decide Which Courts Have Jurisdiction?
- Trump Administration Offers Drilling Leases in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge, but No Major Oil Firms Bid
- Bling Empire's Anna Shay Dead at 62 After Stroke
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- You Might’ve Missed This Euphoria Star’s Cameo on The Idol Premiere
- Tim McGraw and Faith Hill’s Daughter Gracie Shares Update After Taking Ozempic for PCOS
- Can Massachusetts Democrats Overcome the Power of Business Lobbyists and Pass Climate Legislation?
Recommendation
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Q&A: One Baptist Minister’s Long, Careful Road to Climate Activism
Hunter Biden's former business partner was willing to go before a grand jury. He never got the chance.
A Renewable Energy Battle Is Brewing in Arizona, with Confusion as a Weapon
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
A Tale of Two Leaks: Fixed in California, Ignored in Alabama
The Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Climate Change. Is it Ready to Decide Which Courts Have Jurisdiction?
19 Father's Day Gift Ideas for Your Husband That He'll Actually Love